Are boundaries considered permissive and restrictive fire support coordination measures?

Boundaries are indeed considered both permissive and restrictive fire support coordination measures, making the statement true.

Permissive boundaries are established to define areas where friendly forces can conduct fire support without additional coordination. They serve to facilitate operations by allowing commanders to employ fire assets without needing to constantly verify whether they are within a specific area or if friendly forces are at risk.

On the other hand, restrictive fire support coordination measures impose limitations on the use of fire support in certain areas to prevent accidental harm to friendly forces or ensure the safety of civilians and non-combatants. These measures dictate where fire support can and cannot be used based on tactical considerations, environmental factors, or specific mission requirements.

Both types of boundaries are essential for coordinating effective fire support while ensuring the safety of all units involved. This dual nature highlights the importance of boundaries in operational planning and execution, as they help to manage the risks while maximizing the effectiveness of fire support.